7 Elliptic Curves over Finite Fields
Lemma 7.1.
Assuming that:
Then
|
Proof.
We may assume ,
otherwise the result is clear. So .
Let .
Then
Take ,
to
deduce
hence
and hence
□
Theorem 7.2 (Hasse’s Theorem).
Assuming that:
Proof.
Recall
is cyclic of order
and generated by Frobenius .
Let have Weierstrass
equation with coefficients
(so ).
Define the Frobenius endomorphism
This is an isogeny of degree .
Then
|
Lemma
6.3 tells us that
Hence
is separable.
By Theorem 2.8 and the fact that
is a group homomorphism, we argue as in the proof of Theorem 6.5 that
|
is a
positive definite quadratic form (Theorem 5.7, and positive definiteness is obvious since non-constant
morphisms have positive degree).
Lemma 7.1 gives
|
Hence
Definition.
For ,
we put
and .
Corollary 7.3.
Assuming that:
Then
and
.
7.1 Zeta functions
For a
number field, let
|
For a function
field, i.e.
where
is a smooth projective curve,
|
where
(closed points are orbits for action of
on ) and
,
is the
size of orbit.
We have for
some ,
Therefore
|
Definition (Zeta function).
The zeta function
of a smooth projective curve
is defined by
|
Theorem 7.4.
Assuming that:
Then
|
Proof.
Let
be the
power Frobenius map. By Corollary 7.3
Hence ,
.
Example Sheet 2, Q6(iii) implies ,
hence ,
so
|
This second order difference equation with initial conditions
,
has
solution
where
are roots of .
Again by Corollary 7.3,
Therefore
Remark.
Hasse’s Theorem tells us that .
,
and so
.
Let .
,
so ,
so
or .
Then
or ,
so by ,
.
“This is an analog of the Riemann hypothesis.”