6 The Invariant Differential
Let be an algebraic
curve over .
Definition (Space of differentials).
The space of differentials
is the
-vector space
generated by
for ,
subject to the relations
-
(i)
-
(ii)
-
(iii)
Fact: is a
-dimensional
-vector
space.
Let . Let
be a smooth
point, and a
uniformiser at .
Then for some
. We define
(independent
of choice of ).
We assume
is a smooth projective curve.
Definition.
.
Note.
This is a divisor, i.e.
for all but finitely many .
Definition (Regular differential).
A differential
is regular if ,
i.e. it has no poles.
|
As a consequence of Riemann-Roch we have:
If ,
then .
Fact: Suppose ,
. If
, then
.
Lemma 6.1.
Assuming that:
Then is a differential
on with no zeroes or
poles . In particular, the
-vector space of regular
differentials on is
1-dimensional, spanned by .
Proof.
Let ,
.
|
For ,
|
If ,
then .
If
then
.
If
then
.
If
then
.
Therefore
|
(1) and (2) implies .
□
Definition.
For
a non-constant morphism we define
Lemma 6.2.
Assuming that:
Then
(we say
is the invariant differential).
Proof.
is a regular differential on .
So .
The map ,
is a morphism of smooth projective curves but not surjective (misses
and ).
Therefore it is constant (by Theorem 2.8), i.e. there exists
such that
for all .
Taking
shows .
□
Remark.
If ,
,
,
(invariant under ).
Lemma 6.3.
Assuming that:
Then .
Proof.
Write
Fact: is a
2-dimensional -vector
space with basis
and .
Therefore
for some .
For fixed ,
let
Applying to
(1)
gives
Therefore
for all ,
so for
all .
Similarly
for all .
Now pull back by
to get
Lemma 6.4.
Assuming that:
Then is separable
if and only if
is non-zero
Example.
(multiplicative group).
(
integer).
. So if
then
is
separable.
Theorem 2.8 implies for
all but finitely many .
But is a
group homomorphism, so
for all . Thus
and hence
contains
exactly
-th roots
of unity.
Theorem 6.5.
Assuming that:
Proof.
Lemma 6.3 + induction gives .
implies
is separable. So
for all but finitely many .
But
is a group homomorphism, so
for all .
Putting these two statements together gives
|
Group theory (structure theorem) gives that
for some .
Let
be a prime with .
Then .
But ,
so .
But ,
so ,
i.e. .
Since
and ,
we get .
Thus .
□
Remark.
If
then is
inseparable. It can be shown that:
Do not use this remark on Example Sheet 2!