6 The Invariant Differential

Let C be an algebraic curve over K=K¯.

Definition (Space of differentials). The space of differentials ΩC is the K(C)-vector space generated by df for fK(C), subject to the relations

  • (i) d(f+g)=df+dg
  • (ii) d(fg)=fdg+gdf
  • (iii) da=0  aK

Fact: ΩC is a 1-dimensional K(C)-vector space.

Let 0ωΩC. Let PC be a smooth point, and tK(C) a uniformiser at P.

Then ω=fdt for some fK(C). We define ordp(ω)=ordp(f) (independent of choice of t).

We assume C is a smooth projective curve.

Definition. div(ω)=PCordP(ω)PDiv(C).

Note. This is a divisor, i.e. ordp(ω)=0 for all but finitely many PC.

Definition (Regular differential). A differential ωΩC is regular if div(ω)0, i.e. it has no poles.

g(C)=dimK{ωΩC:div(ω)0}.

As a consequence of Riemann-Roch we have:

If 0¬ωΩC, then deg(divω)=2g2.

Fact: Suppose fK(C), ordp(f)=n0. If charKn, then ordp(df)=n1.

Lemma 6.1. Assuming that:

  • charK2

  • E: y2=(xe1)(xe2)(xe3), e1,e2,e3K distinct

Then ω=dxy is a differential on E with no zeroes or poles g(E)=1. In particular, the K-vector space of regular differentials on E is 1-dimensional, spanned by ω.

Proof. Let Ti=(ei,0), E[2]={0,T1,T2,T3}.

div(y)=(T1)+(T2)+(T3)3(0).(1)

For PE{0},

div(xxp)=(P)+(P)2(0).

If PEE[2], then ordp(xxp)=1ordp(dx)=0.

If PEE[2] then ordp(xxp)=1 ordp(dx)=0.

If P=Ti then ordp(xxp)=2 ordp(dx)=1.

If P=0 then ordp(x)=2 ordp(dx)=3.

Therefore

div(dx)=(T1)+(T2)+(T3)3(0).(2)

(1) and (2) implies div(dxy)=0.

Definition. For ϕ:C1C2 a non-constant morphism we define

ϕ:ΩC2ΩC1fdg(ϕf)d(ϕg)

Lemma 6.2. Assuming that:

  • PE,

    τP:EEXP+X

  • ω=dxy as above

Then τPω=ω (we say ω is the invariant differential).

Proof. τPω is a regular differential on E. So τPω=λpω.

The map E1, PλP is a morphism of smooth projective curves but not surjective (misses 0 and ). Therefore it is constant (by Theorem 2.8), i.e. there exists λK such that τPω=λω for all PE.

Taking P=0E shows λ=1.

Remark. If K=, ΛE(), z((z),(z)),

dxy=(z)dz(z)=dz.

(invariant under zz+(const)).

Lemma 6.3. Assuming that:

  • ϕ,ψHom(E1,E2)

  • ω an invariant differential on E2

Then (ϕ+ψ)ω=ϕω+ψω.

Proof. Write E=E2

E×EEμ:(P,Q)P+Qpr1:(P,Q)Ppr2:(P,Q)Q

Fact: ΩE×E is a 2-dimensional K(E×E)-vector space with basis pr1ω and pr2ω.

Therefore

μω=fpr1ω+gpr2ω(1)

for some f,gK(E×E).

For fixed QE, let

ιQ:EE×EP(P,Q)

Applying ιQ to (1) gives

(μιQ)ω=(ιQf)(pr1ιQ)ω+(ιQg)(pr2ιQ)ωτQω=ω=(ιQf)by Lemma 6.2ω+0

Therefore ιQf=1 for all QE, so f(P,Q)=1 for all P,QE.

Similarly g(P,Q)=1 for all P,QE.

(1)μω=pr1ω+pr2ω.

Now pull back by

E1E×EP(ϕ(P),ψ(P))

to get

(ϕ+ψ)ω=ϕω+ψω.

Lemma 6.4. Assuming that:

  • ϕ:C1C2 a non-constant morphism

Then ϕ is separable if and only if ϕ:ΩC1ΩC2 is non-zero

Proof. Omitted.

Example. 𝔾m=𝔸1{0} (multiplicative group).

ϕ:𝔾m𝔾mxxn

(n2 integer).

ϕ(dx)=d(xn)=nxn1dx. So if charKn then ϕ is separable.

Theorem 2.8 implies #ϕ1(Q)=degϕ for all but finitely many Q𝔾m.

But ϕ is a group homomorphism, so

#ϕ1(Q)=#ker(Q)

for all Q𝔾m. Thus #kerϕ= deg ϕ=n and hence K(=K¯) contains exactly n n-th roots of unity.

Theorem 6.5. Assuming that:

  • charKn

Then E[n](n)2.

Proof. Lemma 6.3 + induction gives [n]ω=nω.

charKn implies [n] is separable. So #[n]1(Q)=deg[n] for all but finitely many QE. But [n] is a group homomorphism, so [n]1(Q)=#E[n] for all QE.

Putting these two statements together gives

#E[n]=deg[n]=Corollary 5.9n2.

Group theory (structure theorem) gives that

E[n]d1××dt

for some 1<d1|d2||dt|n.

Let p be a prime with p|d1. Then E[p](p)t. But #E[p]=p2, so t=2. But #E[p]=p2, so t=2, i.e. E[n]d1×d2. Since d1|d2|n and d1d2=n2, we get d1=d2=n.

Thus E[n](n)2.

Remark. If charK=p then [p] is inseparable. It can be shown that:

either E[pr]pr r1“ordinary”or E[p]=0“supersingular”

Do not use this remark on Example Sheet 2!