6 The Invariant Differential

Let C be an algebraic curve over K=K¯.

Definition (Space of differentials). The space of differentials ΩC is the K(C)-vector space generated by df for f∈K(C), subject to the relations

  • (i) d(f+g)=df+dg
  • (ii) d(fg)=fdg+gdf
  • (iii) da=0  ∀⁡a∈K

Fact: ΩC is a 1-dimensional K(C)-vector space.

Let 0≠ω∈ΩC. Let P∈C be a smooth point, and t∈K(C) a uniformiser at P.

Then ω=fdt for some f∈K(C)∗. We define ord⁡p(ω)=ord⁡p(f) (independent of choice of t).

We assume C is a smooth projective curve.

Definition. div⁡(ω)=∑⁡P∈Cord⁡P(ω)P∈Div⁡(C).

Note. This is a divisor, i.e. ord⁡p(ω)=0 for all but finitely many P∈C.

Definition (Regular differential). A differential ω∈ΩC is regular if div⁡(ω)≥0, i.e. it has no poles.

g(C)=dim⁡K{ω∈ΩC:div⁡(ω)≥0}.

As a consequence of Riemann-Roch we have:

If 0¬⁡ω∈ΩC, then deg⁡(div⁡ω)=2g−2.

Fact: Suppose f∈K(C)∗, ord⁡p(f)=n≠0. If char⁡K∤n, then ord⁡p(df)=n−1.

Lemma 6.1. Assuming that:

  • char⁡K≠2

  • E: y2=(x−e1)(x−e2)(x−e3), e1,e2,e3∈K distinct

Then ω=dxy is a differential on E with no zeroes or poles ⟹g(E)=1. In particular, the K-vector space of regular differentials on E is 1-dimensional, spanned by ω.

Proof. Let Ti=(ei,0), E[2]={0,T1,T2,T3}.

div⁡(y)=(T1)+(T2)+(T3)−3(0).(1)

For P∈E∖{0},

div⁡(x−xp)=(P)+(−P)−2(0).

If P∈E∖E[2], then ord⁡p(x−xp)=1⟹ord⁡p(dx)=0.

If P∈E∖E[2] then ord⁡p(x−xp)=1 ⟹ord⁡p(dx)=0.

If P=Ti then ord⁡p(x−xp)=2 ⟹ord⁡p(dx)=1.

If P=0 then ord⁡p(x)=−2 ⟹ord⁡p(dx)=−3.

Therefore

div⁡(dx)=(T1)+(T2)+(T3)−3(0).(2)

(1) and (2) implies div⁡(dxy)=0. □

Definition. For ϕ:C1→C2 a non-constant morphism we define

ϕ∗:ΩC2→ΩC1fdg↦(ϕ∗f)d(ϕ∗g)

Lemma 6.2. Assuming that:

  • P∈E,

    τP:E→EX↦P+X

  • ω=dxy as above

Then τP∗ω=ω (we say ω is the invariant differential).

Proof. τP∗ω is a regular differential on E. So τP∗ω=λpω.

The map E→ℙ1, P↦λP is a morphism of smooth projective curves but not surjective (misses 0 and ∞). Therefore it is constant (by Theorem 2.8), i.e. there exists λ∈K∗ such that τP∗ω=λω for all P∈E.

Taking P=0E shows λ=1. □

Remark. If K=ℂ, ℂ∕Λ→∼E(ℂ), z↦(℘(z),℘′(z)),

dxy=℘′(z)dz℘′(z)=dz.

(invariant under z↦z+(const)).

Lemma 6.3. Assuming that:

  • ϕ,ψ∈Hom⁡(E1,E2)

  • ω an invariant differential on E2

Then (ϕ+ψ)∗ω=ϕ∗ω+ψ∗ω.

Proof. Write E=E2

E×E→Eμ:(P,Q)↦P+Qpr1:(P,Q)↦Ppr2:(P,Q)↦Q

Fact: ΩE×E is a 2-dimensional K(E×E)-vector space with basis pr1∗ω and pr2∗ω.

Therefore

μ∗ω=fpr1∗ω+gpr2∗ω(1)

for some f,g∈K(E×E).

For fixed Q∈E, let

ιQ:E→E×EP↦(P,Q)

Applying ιQ∗ to (1) gives

(μιQ)∗ω=(ιQ∗f)(pr1ιQ)∗ω+(ιQ∗g)(pr2ιQ)∗ωτQ∗ω⏟=ω=(ιQ∗f)⏟by Lemma 6.2ω+0

Therefore ιQ∗f=1 for all Q∈E, so f(P,Q)=1 for all P,Q∈E.

Similarly g(P,Q)=1 for all P,Q∈E.

(1)⟹μ∗ω=pr1∗ω+pr2∗ω.

Now pull back by

E1→E×EP↦(ϕ(P),ψ(P))

to get

(ϕ+ψ)∗ω=ϕ∗ω+ψ∗ω.□

Lemma 6.4. Assuming that:

  • ϕ:C1→C2 a non-constant morphism

Then ϕ is separable if and only if ϕ∗:ΩC1→ΩC2 is non-zero

Proof. Omitted. □

Example. 𝔾m=𝔸1∖{0} (multiplicative group).

ϕ:𝔾m→𝔾mx↦xn

(n≥2 integer).

ϕ∗(dx)=d(xn)=nxn−1dx. So if char⁡K∤n then ϕ is separable.

Theorem 2.8 implies #ϕ−1(Q)=deg⁡ϕ for all but finitely many Q∈𝔾m.

But ϕ is a group homomorphism, so

#ϕ−1(Q)=#ker⁡(Q)

for all Q∈𝔾m. Thus #ker⁡ϕ= deg ⁡ϕ=n and hence K(=K¯) contains exactly n n-th roots of unity.

Theorem 6.5. Assuming that:

  • char⁡K∤n

Then E[n]≅(ℤ∕nℤ)2.

Proof. Lemma 6.3 + induction gives [n]∗ω=nω.

char⁡K∤n implies [n] is separable. So #[n]−1(Q)=deg⁡[n] for all but finitely many Q∈E. But [n] is a group homomorphism, so [n]−1(Q)=#E[n] for all Q∈E.

Putting these two statements together gives

#E[n]=deg⁡[n]=Corollary 5.9n2.

Group theory (structure theorem) gives that

E[n]≅ℤ∕d1ℤ×⋯×ℤ∕dtℤ

for some 1<d1|d2|⋯|dt|n.

Let p be a prime with p|d1. Then E[p]≅(ℤ∕pℤ)t. But #E[p]=p2, so t=2. But #E[p]=p2, so t=2, i.e. E[n]≅ℤ∕d1ℤ×ℤ∕d2ℤ. Since d1|d2|n and d1d2=n2, we get d1=d2=n.

Thus E[n]≅(ℤ∕nℤ)2. □

Remark. If char⁡K=p then [p] is inseparable. It can be shown that:

either E[pr]≅ℤ∕prℤ ∀⁡r≥1“ordinary”or E[p]=0“supersingular”

Do not use this remark on Example Sheet 2!