3 Weierstrass Equations

In this section, we drop the assumption that K=K¯, but we instead assume that K is a perfect field.

Definition (Elliptic curve). An elliptic curve EK is a smooth projective curve of genus 1, defined over K with a specified K-rational point 0EE(K).

Example. {X3+pY3+p2Z3=0}2 is not an elliptic curve over , since it has no -rational points.

Theorem 3.1. Assuming that:

Then E is isomorphic over K to a curve in Weierstrass form via an isomorphism taking 0E to (0:1:0).

Remark. Proposition 2.7 treated the special case E is a smooth plane cubic and 0E is a point of inflection.

Fact: If DDiv(E) is defined over K (i.e. fixed by Gal(K¯K)) then L(D) has a basis in K(E) (not just K¯(E)).

Proof of Theorem 3.1. L(2.0E)L(3.0E). Pick basis 1,x for L(2.0E) and 1,x,y for L(3.0E).

Note: ord0E(x)=2, ord0E(y)=3.

The 7 elements 1,x,y,x2,xy,x3,y2 in the 6-dimensional space L(6.0E) must satisfy a dependence relation.

Leaving out x3 or y2 gives a basis for L(6.0E) since each term has a different order pole at 0E.

Therefore the coefficients of x3 and y2 are non-zero. Rescaling x and y (if necessary) we get

y2+a1xy+a3y=x3+a2x2+a4x+a6

for some aiK.

Let E be the curve defined by this equation (or rather its projective closure). There is a morphism

ϕ:EE2P(x(P):y(P):1)=(xy(P):1:1y(P))0E(0:1:0)

Then

[K(E):K(x)]=deg(Ex1)=ord0E(1x)=2[K(E):K(y)]=deg(Ey1)=ord0E(1y)=3

This gives us a diagram of field extensions:

           K (E)


           K (x,y)


K (x)                  K (y)
By the Tower Law (since 2,3 are coprime), we get that [K(E):K(x,y)]=1. Hence K(E)=K(x,y)=ϕK(E), so degϕ=1, so ϕ is birational.

If E is singular then E and E are rational, contradiction.

So E is smooth. Then Remark 2.9 implies that ϕ1 is a morphism. So ϕ is an isomorphism.

Proposition 3.2. Assuming that:

Then EE over K if and only if the equations are related by a change of variables x=u2x+ry=u3y+u2sx+t

where u,r,s,tK with u0.

Proof.

A Weierstrass form equation defines an elliptic curve if and only if it defines a smooth curve, which happens if and only if Δ(a1,,a6)0, where Δ[a1,,a6] is a certain polynomial.

If charK2,3, we may reduce to the case E:y2=x3+ax+b, with discriminant Δ=16(4a3+27b2).

Corollary 3.3. Assuming that:

  • charK2,3 and K is perfect

  • elliptic curves E:y2=x3+ax+b, E:y2=x3+ax+b

Then E and E are isomorphic over K if and only if a=u4a, b=u6b for some uK.

Proof. E and E are related by a substitution as in Proposition 3.2 with r=s=t=0.

Definition (j-invariant). The j-invariant is

j(E)=1728(4a3)4a3+27b2.

Corollary 3.4. Assuming that:

  • EE

Then j(E)=j(E). Moreover, the converse holds if K=K¯.

Proof.

EE{a=u4ab=u6b for some uK(a3:b2)=((a)3:(b)2)j(E)=j(E)

and the converse holds if K=K¯ (to go backwards on the step, we only need to take some kind of n-th root).