5 Upper bounds on
Theorem 5.1 (Ajtai-Komlos-Szemeredi, 1980s + Shearer 80s).
.
Theorem 5.2 (Shearer, 1980s).
Assuming that:
Then
where
as .
Remark.
If we take
and modify, for ,
one can show that there exist graphs with no triangles and
Sketch pad:
-
Idea I:
Greedily build an independent set .
-
Idea II:
Choose a set at random?? Choose each vertex with probability
. But note
, so for each vertex,
we are likely to pick
of its neighbours.
-
Idea III:
Use Local Lemma? Too much dependence.
-
Idea IV:
Combine Ideas I and II by using a random greedy process. Take a vertex, remove its neighbours.
Then using the triangle-freeness, we should get that density increases.
Heuristic: Let’s say we build an independent set
using this process
with . Assumption:
“the set
looks like a random set of its density – apart from the fact that it’s independent”.
Let’s consider the largest
we can hope for. Say a vertex
is open if .
We might expect
Note that
then process is basically over (“amount of vertices left that we could potentially use is
than the number of vertices we have so far, so not really any point in trying to collect them”). So
solve
|
|
Fact. Let be a
covex function on .
Let be
a random variable. Then
Fact. Let be a graph
with average degree .
Then
|
|
Proof.
𝟙𝟙
The inequality follows by Jensen. □
Define
Note
for ,
and
. We
have
by remainder form of Taylor’s theorem.
Theorem 5.3 (Shearer on ).
Assuming that:
-
an
vertex graph
-
triangle-free
-
average degree
Proof.
Let .
Define .
We have
|
|
where
|
|
and
by triangle-free property.
We have
We want
|
|
We claim this holds on average. Average of left hand side is
|
|
Average of right hand side is (using ),
In fact,
satisfies the differential equation
So the inequality holds on average, and thus there exists a good choice of
for the
induction. □
Another proof of Theorem 5.2 (but with some constant
instead
of , and
this time we’ll assume the maximum degree is bounded rather than the average degree):
Proof.
Choose an independent set
uniformly at random among all independent sets. We’ll show
Let , for
, be
defined by
Note, fix ,
|
|
So
and so enough to show
for and
some .
Now fix
and define
|
|
We now bound
So now fix some .
We consider
where
( here
means ). Let
. Now observe that
is uniform over all
independent sets in .
|
|
Now solve
which is , so
. So
5.1 Recap of
bounds proved in this course
We have shown
|
|
Kim showed .
Triangle-free process: Define the random graph process
. Given
define
Now sample uniformly
at random, and define .
Theorem 5.4 (Shearer upper bound on ).
.
Proof.
Let .
If there is a vertex of degree
in the blue graph then we have an independent set of size
because the blue graph must be triangle-free, otherwise done. So the max degree of blue graph is
.
So apply Shearer, 1980s to get (for large )
that
(where
is the blue graph). □