14 Higher Ramification Groups

Let L∕K be a finite Galois extension of local fields, and πL∈OL a uniformiser.

Definition 14.1 (s-th ramification group). Let vL be a normalised valuation in OL. For s∈ℝ≥−1, the s-th ramification group is

Gs(L∕K)={σ∈Gal⁡(K)|vL(σ(x)−x)≥s+1 ∀⁡x∈OL}.

Remark. Gs only changes at integers.

Gs, s∈ℝ≥−1 used to define upper numbering.

Example.

G−1(L∕K)=Gal⁡(L∕K)G0(L∕K)={σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K)|σ(x)≡xmodπL ∀⁡x∈OL}=ker⁡(Gal⁡(L∕K)↠Gal⁡(kL∕k))=IL∕K

Note. For s∈ℤ≥0,

Gs(L∕K)=ker⁡(Gal⁡(L∕K)↠Aut⁡(OL∕πLs+1OL))

hence Gs(L∕K) is normal in G−1.

⋯⊆Gs⊆Gs−1⊆⋯⊆G−1=Gal⁡(L∕K).

Theorem 14.2.

  • (i) For s≥1,
    Gs={σ∈G0|vL(σ(πL)−πL)≥s+1}.
  • (ii) ⋂⁡n=0∞Gn={1}.
  • (iii) Let s∈ℤ≥0. Then there exists an injective group homomorphism
    Gs∕Gs+1↪UL(s)∕UL(s+1)

    induced by σ↦σ(πL)πL. This map is independent of the choice of πL.

Proof. Let K0⊆L be a maximal unramified extension of K in L. Upon replacing K by K0, we may assume that L∕K is totally ramified.

  • (i) Theorem 13.8 implies OL∕OK[πL]. Suppose vL(σ(πL)−πL)≥s+1. Let x∈OL, then x=f(πL), f(X)∈OK[X]. σ(x)−x=σ(f(πL))−f(πL)=f(σ(πL))−f(πL)=(σ(πL)−πL)g(πL)

    for some g(X)∈OK[X], using the fact that Xn−Yn=(X−Y)(Xn−1+⋯+Yn−1). Thus

    vL(σ(x)−x)=vL(σ(πL)−πL)+vL(g(πL))⏟≥0≥s+1.
  • (ii) Suppose σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K), σ≠1. Then σ(πL)≠πL, because L=K(πL) and hence vL(σ(πL)−πL)<∞. Thus σ∉Gs for some s≫0 by (i).
  • (iii) Note: for σ∈Gs, s∈ℤ≥0,
    σ(πL)∈πL+πLs+1OL

    hence

    σ(πL)πL∈1+πLsOL=UL(s).

    We claim

    φ:Gs→UL(s)∕UL(s+1)σ↦σ(πL)πL

    is a group homomorphism with kernel Gs+1. For σ,τ∈Gs, let τ(πL)=uπL, u∈OL×. Then

    στ(πL)πL=σ(τ(πL))τ(πL)τ(πL)πL=σ(u)uσ(πL)πLτ(πL)πL

    But σ(u)∈u+πLs+1OL since σ∈Gs. Thus σ(u)u∈UL(s+1) and hence

    στ(πL)πL≡σ(πL)πL⋅τ(πL)πLmodUL(s+1).

    Hence φ is a group homomorphism. Moreover,

    ker⁡(φ)={σ∈Gs|σ(πL)≡πLmodπLs+1}=Gs+1.

    If πL′=aπL is another uniformiser, a∈OL×. Then

    σ(πL′)πL′=σ(a)a⋅σ(πL)πL≡σ(πL)πLmodUL(s+1).□

Corollary 14.3. Gal⁡(L∕K) is solvable.

Proof. By Proposition 13.11, Theorem 14.2 and Theorem 13.4, for s∈ℤ≥−1,

Gs∕Gs+1≅a subgroup{Gal⁡(kL∕k)if s=−1(kL×,×)if s=0(kL,+)if s≥1

Thus Gs∕Gs+1 is solvable for s≥−1. Conclude using Theorem 14.2(ii). □

Let characteristic⁡k=p. Then p∤|G0∕G1| and |G1|=pn. Thus G1 is the unique (since normal) Sylow p-subgroup of G0=IL∕K.

Definition 14.4. G1 is called the wild inertial group, and G0∕G1 is called the tame quotient.

Suppose L∕K is finite separable. Say L∕K is tamely ramified if characteristic⁡k∤eL∕K. Otherwise it is wildly ramified.

Theorem 14.5. Assuming that:

  • [K:ℚp]<∞

  • L∕K finite

  • DL∕K=(πδ(L∕K))

Then δ(L∕K)≥eL∕K−1, with equality if and only if tamely ramified. In particular, L∕K unramified if and only if DL∕K=OL.

Proof. Example Sheet 3 shows DL∕K=DL∕K0⋅DK0∕K. Suffices to check 2 cases:

  • (i) L∕K unramified. Then ?? gives that OL=OK[α], for some α∈OL with kL=k(a¯).

    Let g(X)∈OK[X] be the minimal polynomial of α. Since [L:K]=[kL:k], we have that g¯(X)∈k[X] is the minimal polynomial of a¯. g¯(X) separable and hence g′(α)⁄≡0(modπ)L. Theorem 12.8 implies DL∕K=(g(α))=OL.

  • (ii) L∕K totally ramified. Say [L:K]=e, OL=OK[πL], πL a root of
    g(X)=Xe+∑i=0e−1aiXi∈OK[X]

    is Eisenstein. Then

    g′(πL)=eπLe−1⏟≥e−1+∑i=1e−1iaiπLi−1⏟vL≥e.

    Thus vL(y′(πL))≥e−1. Equality if and only if p∤e. □

Corollary 14.6. Suppose L∕K is an extension of number fields. Let P⊆OL, P∩OK=𝔭. Then e(P∕𝔭)>1 if and only if P|DL∕K.

Proof. Theorem 12.9 implies DL∕K=∏⁡PDLP∕K𝔭. Then use e(P∕𝔭)=eLP∕K𝔭 and Theorem 14.5. □

Example.

  • K=ℚp, ζpn a primitive pn-th root of unity. L=ℚp(ζpn). The pn-th cyclotomic polynomial is

    Φpn(X)=Xpn−1(p−1)+Xpn−1(p−2)+⋯+1∈ℤp[X].

    See Example Sheet 3.

  • Φpn(X) irreducible (hence Φpn(X) is the minimal polynomial of ζpn).

  • L∕ℚp is Galois, totally ramified of degree pn+1(p−1).

  • π:=ζpn−1 a uniformiser in OL ⇝ OL=ℤp[ζpn−1]=ℤp[ζpn].

  • Gal⁡(L∕ℚp)→∼(ℤ∕pnℤ)× (abelian). σm↔m where σm(ζpn)=ζpnm.

    vL(σm(π)−π)=vL(ζpnm−ζpn)=vL(ζpnm−1−1).

    Let k be maximal such that pk|m−1. Then ζpnm−1 is a primitive pn−k-th root of unity, and hence ζpnm−1−1 is a uniformiser π′ in L′=ℚp(ζpnm−1). Hence

    vL(ζpnm−1−1)=eL∕L′=eL∕ℚpeL′∕ℚp=[L:ℚp][L′:ℚp]=pn−1(p−1)pn−k−1(p−1)=pk.

    Theorem 14.2(i) implies that σm∈Gi if and only if pk≥i+1. Thus

    Gi≅{(ℤ∕pnℤ)×i≤0(1+pkℤ)∕pnℤpk−1−1<i≤pk−1(1≤k≤i+1){1}pn−1−1<i.