2 Valuation Rings

Definition 2.1 (Valuation). Let K be a field. A valuation on K is a function v:K× such that

  • (i) v(xy)=v(x)+v(y)
  • (ii) v(x+y)min(v(x),v(y))

Fix 0<α<1. If v is a valuation on K, then

|x|={αv(x)x00x=0

determines a non-archimedean absolute value on K.

Conversely a non-archimedean absolute value determines a valuation v(x)=logα|x|.

Remark.

  • Ignore the trivial valuation v(x)=0.

  • Say v1,v2 are equivalent if there exists c>0 such that v1(x)=cv2(x) for all xK×.

Example.

  • K=, vp(x)=logp|x|p is known as the p-adic valuation.

  • If k is a field, consider K=k(t)=Frac(k[t]) the rational function field. Then define

    v(tnf(t)g(t))=n

    for f,gk[t] with f(0),g(0)0. We call this the t-adic valuation.

  • K=k((t))=Frac(k[[t]])={i=naiti|aik,n}, known as the field of formal Laurent series over k. Then we can define

    v(Iaiti)=min{i|ai0}

    is the t-adic valuation on K.

Definition 2.2. Let (K,||) be a non-archimedean valued field. The valuation ring of K is defined to be

OK={xK||x|1}(=B¯(0,1))(={xK×|v(x)0}{0})

Proposition 2.3.

  • (i) OK is an open subring of K
  • (ii) The subsets {xK||x|r} and {xK||x|<r} for r1 are open ideals in OK.
  • (iii) OK×={xK||x|=1}.

Proof.

  • (i) |0|=0, |1|=1 so 0,1OK. If xOK, then |x|=|x| hence xOK. If x,yOK, then
    |x+y|max(|x|,|y|)1.

    Hence x+yOK. If x,yOK, then |xy|=|x||y|1, hence xyOK. Thus OK is a ring. Since OK=B¯(0,1), it is open.

  • (ii) Similar to (i).
  • (iii) Note that |x||x1|=|xx1|=1. Thus |x|=1|x1|=1x,x1OKxOK×

Notation.

  • m:={xOK||x|<1} is a max ideal of OK.

  • k:=OKm is the residue field.

Corollary 2.4. OK is a local ring with unique maximal ideal m (a local ring is a ring with a unique maximal ideal).

Proof. Let m be a maximal ideal. Suppose mm. Then there exists xmm. Using part (iii) of Proposition 2.3, we get that x is a unit, hence m=OK, a contradiction.

Example. K= with ||p. Then

OK=(p)={ab|pb},

and m=p(p), k=𝔽p.

Definition 2.5. Let v:K× be a valuation. If v(K×), we say v is a discrete valuation. K is said to be a discretely valued field. An element πOK is uniformiser if v(π)>0 and v(π) generates v(K×).

Example.

Remark. If v is a discrete valuation, can replace with equivalent one such that v(K×)=> Call such a v normalised valuations (then v(π)=1 if and only if π is a unit).

Lemma 2.6. Assuming that:

Then the following are equivalent:
  • (i) v is discrete
  • (ii) OK is a PID
  • (iii) OK is Noetherian
  • (iv) m is principal

Proof.

  • (i) (ii) OK is an integral domain since it is a subset of K, which is an integral domain.

    Let IOK be a non-zero ideal. Let xI such that v(x)=min{v(a)|aI}, which exists since v is discrete. Then we claim

    xOK={aOK|v(a)v(x)}

    is equal to I.

    • (I is an ideal)
    • Let yI. Then v(x1y)0. Hence y=x(x1y)xOK.
  • (ii) (iii) Clear.
  • (iii) (iv) Write m=x1OK++xnOK. Without loss of generality,
    v(x1)v(x2)v(xn).

    Then x2,,xnx1OK. Hence m=x1OK.

  • (iv) (i) Let m=πOK for some πOK and let c=v(π). Then if v(x)>0, xm hence v(x)c. Thus v(K×)(0,c)=. Since v(K×) is a subgroup of (,+), we deduce v(K×)=.

Suppose v is a discrete valuation on K, πOK a uniformiser. For xK×, let n such that v(x)=nv(π). Then u=πnxOK× and x=uπn. In particular, K=OK[1π] and hence K=Frac(OK).

Definition 2.7 (Discrete valuation ring). A ring R is called a discrete valuation ring (DVR) if it is a PID with exactly one non-zero prime ideal (necessarily maximal).

Lemma 2.8.

Proof.

  • (i) OK is a PID by Lemma 2.6. Hence any non-zero prime ideal is maximal and hence OK is a discrete valuation ring since it is a local ring.
  • (ii) Let R be a discrete valuation ring, with maximal ideal m. Then m=(π) for some πR. Since PIDs are UFDs, we may write any xR{0} uniquely as πnu with n0, uR×. Then any yK× can be written uniquely as πmu with uR×, m. Define v(πmu)=m; check v is a valuation and OK=R.

Example. (p), k[[t]] (k a field) are discrete valuation rings.