7 Size Ramsey number of a graph

Definition 7.1 (G -¿ H). Let G, H be graphs. We write

G→H

to mean every red / blue colouring of G contains a monochromatic H.

Example. K6→K3.

Example. R(k)=min⁡{n:Kn→Kk}.

Question: How few edges can a graph G have with G→H?

Definition 7.2 (Size Ramsey number). The size Ramsey number of H is

r^(H)=min⁡{e(G):G→H}.

Theorem 7.3. r^(Kk)=R(k)2.

7.1 The size Ramsey number of the path

Straightforward bounds:

2k≤r^(Pk)≤(ck)2.

The upper bound is by using the bound on Ramsey numbers of sparse graphs proved last section.

Surprisingly:

Theorem 7.4 (Beck, ’83). r^(Pk)≤Ck, for some constant C>0.

Theorem 7.5 (Beck, ’83 (Beck 2)). There exists c,C>0, such that the following holds: Let p=Cn and let G∼G(n,p). Then

ℙ(G→Pk)=1−o(1)

where k=cn.

Definition 7.6. Let G be a graph on n vertices. Say that G is δ-pseudorandom if all sets A,B⊂V(G) which are disjoint and |A|,|B|≥8n have e(A,B)>0.

Lemma 7.7. Assuming that:

  • δ>0

Then there exists C≥4δ2 such that if p=Cn and G∼G(n,p) then
ℙ(G is δ-pseudorandom)=1−o(1).

Proof. For A,B∈[n](δn) disjoint,

ℙ(e(A,B)=0)=(1−p)|A||B|≤e−pδ2n2≤e−Cδ2n

Then

𝔼(# of A,B∈[n](δn) with e(A,B)=0)≤22n⋅e−Cδ2n→0

So done by Markov. □

Lemma 7.8. Assuming that:

  • G a graph on n vertices

  • G⁄⊃Pk

  • a,b∈ℤ≥0 such that a+b=n−k

Then there exist disjoint A,B⊂V(G) with |A|=a, |B|=b and e(A,B)=0.

PIC

Proof. We apply the following “Depth first search algorithm”. We maintain a partition V(G)=A∪B∪P where P is a path. First set A=V(G), B=P=∅. We now repeat the following until A=∅:

  • (1) If P=∅, then move a vertex from A into P.
  • (2) If P≠∅, let v be the end of the path P. If ∃⁡u∈N(v)∩A, we move u to the end of P. If N(v)∩A=∅, we move v into B.

We note that since G is Pk-free, we have |P|≤k and therefore

|A∪B|=|A|+|B|≥n−k

always.

Also note that at each step we:

  • Either decrease A by 1; or

  • We increase |B| by 1.

Since |A|=n at the start and |A|=0at the end, there must be some time for which |A|=a and |B|≥b.

Now since e(A,B)=0 at all times, we are done. □

Proof of Beck, ’83 (Beck 2). Let G be a graph on n vertices that is δ-pseudorandom with δ=116. Let k=𝜀n, where 𝜀>0 we choose later. We show G→Pk. So assume not. Let G=GR∪GB where GR⁄⊃Pk, GB⁄⊃Pk. Apply lemma to both GR and GB to find A,B,A′,B′⊂V(G) with |A|=|B|=|A′|=|B′|=(12−𝜀2)n and such that A,B have no red edges between then and A′,B′ have no blue edges between them.

PIC

Note

|(A∪B)∩A′|≥(12−𝜀2)n.

Without loss of generality assume

|A∩A′|≥(14−𝜀)n.

So

|A∩B′|≤|A|−|A∩A′|≤(14−2𝜀)n.

Thus

|B∩B′|≥(14−4𝜀)n.

So A∩A′ and B∩B′ have no edges between them in G, which contradicts the δ-pseudorandomness if 𝜀=132. So G→Pk.

So by Lemma 7.7 (which said that G(n,Cn) is δ-pseudorandom with high probability), we are done. □

Proof of Beck, ’83. Enough to prove for k sufficiently large. We set k=𝜀n as before, δ=116 and let C>4δ2. Then G∼G(n,p) satisfies

G→Pkwhp.

Now note

ℙ(e(G)≥pn2)≤𝔼e(G)pn2≤12.

So (at least) 12−o(1) proportion of all such graphs work. □