3 An edge deletion method
Similar to the above lower bound on ,
Erdős proved:
Theorem (Erdős).
There exist graphs
with arbitrarily large chromatic number and arbitrarily large girth, i.e. for all
there exists
with
girth
and .
Idea: let’s delete an edge from each triangle, instead of a vertex (we have a lot more edges to spend than we
have vertices!).
For this we need
so . For
some small .
Danger: when we delete an edge from each triangle, we need to ensure that we don’t hurt
.
Theorem 3.1 (Erdos, 1960s).
for some .
To prove this, it is enough to prove for sufficiently large
that there exists a
triangle free graph on
vertices with
for some .
This is because we can set ,
and then get .
More sketching of the idea: we know .
What if ? Then there
must be an edge (because .
Not very impressive.
What if ? Then we actually
get a lot of edges: expect ,
and can guarantee .
Lemma 3.2.
Assuming that:
-
-
-
Then with high probability every set of size
in
induces
edges.
Proof.
Fix
and fix a set
with size .
for some .
We now union bound on all .
(using )
which
for .
□
Lemma 3.3.
Assuming that:
-
be a collection of events
-
,
for ,
be the event that t independent events of
occur
Remark.
.
We will use
for large in
the above lemma to get:
|
|
Proof.
Let .
𝟙𝟙
Theorem 3.4.
Assuming that:
Then there exists a triangle-free graph
on
vertices with
Proof.
Let
be large. Let
for some .
Let ,
and let
be
with a maximal collection of edge disjoint triangles
removed, i.e. .
Clearly is triangle-free.
We let be the event
that every set of size ,
where contains
at least
edges. We now consider
|
|
So
|
|
We now union-bound
Define to be the collection of all
triangles that meet in at least
one edge, and define the event .
Note that the event ,
where , from the lemma
holds on the event that
meets
in
edges. This is where we use the fact that we only choose edge-disjoint triangles! By Lemma 3.3, we
have
So
|
|
if is chosen to
be small and
large. □