2 Valuation Rings
Definition 2.1 (Valuation).
Let
be a field. A valuation on
is a function
such that
-
(i)
-
(ii)
Fix . If
is a valuation
on ,
then
determines a non-archimedean absolute value on .
Conversely a non-archimedean absolute value determines a valuation
.
Remark.
-
Ignore the trivial valuation .
-
Say
are equivalent if there exists
such that
for all .
Example.
-
,
is known as the -adic
valuation.
-
If is a field,
consider
the rational function field. Then define
for
with .
We call this the -adic
valuation.
-
, known as the field of
formal Laurent series over .
Then we can define
is the -adic
valuation on .
Definition 2.2.
Let
be a non-archimedean valued field. The valuation ring of
is
defined to be
Proposition 2.3.
-
(i)
is an open subring of
-
(ii)
The subsets
and
for
are open ideals in .
-
(iii)
.
Proof.
-
(i)
,
so
. If
, then
hence
. If
,
then
Hence .
If ,
then ,
hence .
Thus
is a ring. Since ,
it is open.
-
(ii)
Similar to (i).
-
(iii)
Note that .
Thus
Corollary 2.4.
is a local
ring with unique maximal ideal
(a local ring is a ring with a unique maximal ideal).
Proof.
Let
be a maximal ideal. Suppose .
Then there exists .
Using part (iii) of Proposition 2.3, we get that
is a unit, hence ,
a contradiction. □
Example.
with .
Then
and ,
.
Definition 2.5.
Let
be a valuation. If ,
we say
is a discrete valuation.
is said to be a discretely valued field. An element
is uniformiser if
and
generates .
Remark.
If
is a discrete valuation, can replace with equivalent one such that
> Call such a
normalised
valuations (then
if and only if
is a unit).
Lemma 2.6.
Assuming that:
Then the following are equivalent:
-
(i)
is discrete
-
(ii)
is a PID
-
(iii)
is Noetherian
-
(iv)
is principal
Proof.
-
(i) (ii)
is an integral domain since it is a subset of ,
which is an integral domain.
Let be a non-zero
ideal. Let such
that , which
exists since
is discrete. Then we claim
is equal to .
-
(
is an ideal)
-
Let .
Then .
Hence .
-
(ii) (iii)
Clear.
-
(iii) (iv)
Write .
Without loss of generality,
Then .
Hence .
-
(iv) (i)
Let for
some
and let .
Then if ,
hence
. Thus
. Since
is a subgroup
of , we
deduce .
□
Suppose is a discrete
valuation on ,
a uniformiser.
For , let
such
that .
Then
and . In
particular,
and hence .
Definition 2.7 (Discrete valuation ring).
A ring
is called a discrete valuation ring (DVR) if it is a PID with exactly one non-zero prime ideal (necessarily
maximal).
Proof.
-
(i)
is a PID by Lemma 2.6. Hence any non-zero prime ideal is maximal and hence
is a discrete valuation ring since it is a local ring.
-
(ii)
Let
be a discrete valuation ring, with maximal ideal .
Then
for some .
Since PIDs are UFDs, we may write any
uniquely as
with ,
.
Then any
can be written uniquely as
with ,
.
Define ;
check
is a valuation and .
□