Proof.
Let
with .
Then
Since has
characteristic ,
we have .
Thus
|
hence .
β‘
Proof of TheoremΒ 5.2.
Let .
For each we
choose a lift
of , and
we define
We claim that
is a Cauchy sequence and its limit is independent of the choice of .
By construction, .
By LemmaΒ 5.4 and induction on ,
we have
and hence
(take ).
Hence
is Cauchy, so .
Suppose arises from
another choice of
lifting .
Then is
Cauchy, and .
Let
|
Then
arises from lifting
|
Then
is Cauchy and ,
.
So
and hence
is independet of the choice of .
So we may define .
Then .
Hence .
So (i) is satisfied.
We let
and we choose
a lift of ,
and let .
Then .
Now is
a lift of ,
hence
|
So (ii) is satisfied.
If ,
is a lift
of .
Then
Easy to check that ,
, and
hence is
a ring homomorphism.
Uniqueness: let be another
such map. Then for ,
is a lift
of . It
follows that
Proof.
Since , it
suffices to show .
Fix a uniformiser,
and let
be the TeichmΓΌller map and define
Then is a ring
homomorphism since
is, and it is a bijection by PropositionΒ 3.4(ii). β‘