9 Algebraically closed fields

Definition (Algebraically closed). Suppose (K,+,) is a field (in Lrings). It is algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial over K has a root in K.

Definition 9.1 (ACF). ACF is the Lrings theory axiomatising algebraically closed fields. It consists of:

  • field axioms

  • for every d1, we add an axiom:

    v0,,vd,x(vd0v0+v1x++vdxd=0).

Note. This is an infinite axiomatisation.

Definition 9.2 (ACF with characteristic). For n1, let χn be the sentence

1++1n times=0.

Set

ACF0=ACF{¬χn:n}ACFp=ACF{χp}(for p a prime)

Theorem 9.3. ACF0 and ACFp are κ-categorical for κ>0.

Proof. The Transcendence degree of kACF (and algebraically closed field) is the cardinality of the largest algebraically independent subset of k.

For example,

trdeg(¯)=0trdeg((π)¯)=1trdeg()=20trdeg((xi)i<κ¯)=κ

From algebra we know:

Corollary 9.4. ACF0 and ACFp are complete.

Proof. Los-Vaught test.

Remark. ACF0 and ACFp are not 0-categorical. (Consider fields with different finite transcendence degrees).

Definition 9.5 (Polynomial map). Let k be a field. We say a function ϕ:KmKm is a polynomial map if

Φ(x¯)=(p1(x1,,xm),,pn(x1,,xm))

where each p1,,pn is a polynomial.

Theorem 9.6 (Ax-Grothendieck). Assuming that:

  • k an algebraically closed field

  • Φ:KnKn an injective polynomial map

Then Φ is surjective.

Proof. First suppose K=𝔽p¯ for some prime p. 𝔽p¯=k𝔽pk. Fix an m such that the coefficients of Φ all lie in 𝔽pm. Note: 𝔽p¯=k𝔽pmk.

For any k1, Φ induces an injective polynomial map 𝔽pkm𝔽pkm which has to be surjective (as finite field). Hence

Φ(𝔽p¯n)=Φ(k𝔽pmkn)=kΦ(𝔽pmkn)=k𝔽pmkn=𝔽p¯n

So Φ is surjective.

Given n,d1, let ψn,d be the L-sentence expressing “every injective polynomial map with n-coordinates, each of which is a polynomial in n variables with degree at most d, is surjective”.

Exercise: Show that this is a first order Lrings sentence.

Now 𝔽p¯ψn,d for all n,d1 and p prime.

ACFp is complete, so ACFpψn,d. Now consider ACF0. Suppose for contradiction that ACF0ψn,d for some n,d, so ACF0¬ψn,d.

By compactness, there exists ΣACF0 finite such that Σ¬ψn,d.

In particular, ΣACF{¬χ0,,¬χm} for some m. Choose a prime p such that p>m and ACFpΣ.

So must have ACFp¬ψn,d, contradiction.

Theorem 9.7 (Lipschiptz principal). Assuming that:

  • ϕ an Lrings sentence

Then the following are equivalent:
  • (1) ACF0ϕ, i.e. ϕ in every kACF0
  • (2) ACF0{ϕ} is consistent
  • (3) there exists some n>0 such that ACFpϕ for any p>n
  • (4) for all n>0, there exists some p>n such that ACFp{ϕ} is consistent