3 Categoricity

Definition 3.1 (kappa-categorical). An L-theory is κ-categorical if it has a unique model of size κ up to isomorphism.

For now, assume our theories have infinite models and that κ0+|L|.

Example 3.2.

So we can find four different cases... surprisingly this is all.

Theorem (Morley’s Categoricity Theorem 1965). Assuming that:

Then it is κ-categorical for all uncountable κ.

We do not prove this theorem in this course. The statement is examinable, but the proof is not.

Dense linear orders (with no endpoints)

Definition 3.3 (Theory of dense linear orders). Let L={<}. We define the theory in axioms:

  • (i)
    Irreflexive: x,¬(x<x).
  • (ii)
    Transitive: x,y,z,((x<yy<z)x<z).
  • (iii)
    Antisymmetric: x,y,(xy(x<yy<x)).
  • (iv)
    Dense: x,y,(x<y(z(x<z<y)).
  • (v)
    No endpoints: x,y,z,(z<x<y).

Note. DLO is consistent, because (,<)DLO.

Theorem 3.4 (Cantor 1895). DLO is 0-categorical.

Proof. Let M,NDLO with M,N countable. We need to construct an L-isomorphism h:MN, i.e. an order preserving bijection.

We will use the back and forth method.

Let M={a1,a2,} and N={b1,b2,}.

We construct a series of functions (hn)n=0 such that:

Once we have done this, h=n=0hn is an order-preserving bijection h:MN (i.e. an L-isomorphism).

Use induction.

Base case: X0={x0}, Y0={b0}, h0(a0)=b0.

Inductive step: Suppose hn:XnYn as required.

“Forth”: Construct an order preserving bijection h:XY extending hn with an+1X. Enumerate Xn={x1,,xk} with x1<Mx2<Mx3<M<Mxk. Let yi=h(xi) so that y1<My2<M<Myk.

PIC

Define h=hn{(an+1,b)} where bN is chosen according to the following cases:

Then h is an order-preserving bijection and an+1Xn+1 as desired.

“Back”: We need to construct an order-preserving map hn+1Yn+1 extending h with bn+1Yn+1.

Exercise.

Then hn+1 satisfies the conditions.

Note. We used that N,M were countable.

The theory DLO is not uncountably categorical:

Consider (,<), and consider × with the lexicographic order ((a,b)<(c,d) if and only if a<c or a=c and b<d). These are both models of DLO (and have the same cardinality), but are not isomorphic (e.g. because the first does not have any countable intervals, or because the second does not have all bounded suprema).

Corollary 3.5. DLO is complete.

Proof. No finite models (because of the no end points axiom).

If M,NDLO, with both countable, then MN and hence MN.

So by Los-Vaught test, DLO is complete.