9 Dedekind domains Definition 9 1 Dedekind domain A Dedekind domain is a ring R such that i R is a Noetherian integral domain ii R is integrally closed in Frac R iii Every non zero prime ideal is maximal Example The ring of integers in a number field is a Dedekind domain Any PID hence a discrete valuation ring is a Dedekind domain Theorem 9 2 A ring R is a discrete valuation ring if and only if R is a Dedekind domain with exactly one non zero prime Lemma 9 3 Assuming that R is a Noetherian ring I R a non zero ideal Then there exists non zero prime ideals p 1 p r such that p 1 p r I Proof Suppose not Since R is Noetherian we may choose I maximal with this property Then I is not prime so there exists x y R I such that x y I Let I 1 x I 2 I y Then by maximality of I there exist p 1 p r and q 1 q s such that p 1 p r I 1 and q 1 q s I 2 Then p 1 p r q 1 q s I 1 I 2 I Lemma 9 4 Assuming that R is an integral domain R is integrally closed in K Frac R 0 I R a finitely generated ideal x K Then if x I I we have x R Proof Let I c 1 c n We write x c i j 1 n a i j c j for some a i j R Let A be the matrix A a i j 1 i j n and set B x id n A M n n K Then in K n B c 1 c n 0 Multiply by adj B the adjugate matrix for B We have det B id n c 1 c n 0 Hence det B 0 But det B is a monic polynomial with coefficients in R Then x is integral over R hence x R Proof of Theorem 9 2 Clear We need to show R is a PID The assumption implies that R is a local ring with unique maximal ideal m Step 1 m is principal Let 0 x m By Lemma 9 3 x m n for some n 1 Let n minimal such that x m n then we may choose y m n 1 x Set x y Then we have y m m n x and hence 1 m R If 1 m m then 1 R by Lemma 9 4 and y x contradiction Hence 1 m R so m R is principal Step 2 R is a PID Let I R be a non zero ideal Consider a sequence of fractional ideals I 1 I 2 I in K Then since 1 R we have k I k 1 I for all k by Lemma 9 4 Therefore since R is Noetherian we may choose n maximal such that n I R If n I m then n 1 R So we must have n I R and hence I n Let R be an integral domain and S R a multiplicatively closed subset x y S implies x y S and also have 1 S The localisation S 1 R of R with respect to S is the ring S 1 R r s r R s S Frac R If p is a prime ideal in R we write R p for the localisation with respect to S R p Example p 0 then R p Frac R R p a b a b p 1 where p is a rational prime Facts not proved in this course but can be found in a typical course textbook on commutative algebra R Noetherian implies S 1 R is Noetherian Corollary 9 5 Let R be a Dedekind domain and p R a non zero prime ideal Then R p is a discrete valuation ring Proof By properties of localisation R p is a Noetherian integral domain with a unique non zero prime ideal p R p It suffices to show R p is integrally closed in Frac R p Frac R since then R p is a Dedekind domain hence by Theorem 9 2 R p is a discrete valuation ring Let x Frac R be integral over R p Multiplying by denominators of a monic polynomial satisfied by x we obtain s x n a n 1 x n 1 a 0 0 with a i R s S R p Multiply by s n 1 Then x s is integral over R so x s R Hence x R p Definition 9 6 Valuation on a Dedekind domain If R is a Dedekind domain and p R a non zero prime ideal we write v p for the normalised valuation on Frac R Frac R p corresponding to the discrete valuation ring R p Example R p p then v p is the p adiv valuation Theorem 9 7 Assuming that R is a Dedekind domain I R a non zero ideal Then Ican be written uniquely as aproduct of prime ideals I p 1 e 1 p r e r with p i distinct Remark Clear for PIDs PID implies UFD Proof Sketch We quote the following properties of localisation i I J I R p J R p for all prime ideals p ii If R a Dedekind domain p 1 p 2 non zero ideals then p 1 R p 2 p 2 R p 2 p 1 p 2 R p 2 p 1 p 2 Let I R be a non zero ideal By Lemma 9 3 there are distinct prime ideals p 1 p r such that p 1 1 p r r I where i 0 Let 0 p be a prime ideal p p 1 p r Then property ii gives that p i R p R p and hence I R p R p Corollary 9 5 gives I R p p i R p i i p i i R p i for some 0 i i Thus I p 1 1 p r r by property i For uniqueness if I p 1 1 p r r p 1 1 p r r then p i i R p i p i i R p i hence a i i by unique factorisation in discrete valuation rings