6 Tube incidence implications of Fourier restriction Last time LOCALLY CONSTANT PROPERTY think of it more as heuristic If supp f B 1 then 1 Imagine f const on unit balls 2 f B 1 f B 1 What if supp f B 0 so f const on 1 balls where B B 1 1 B 1 is approximately averaging over a 1 ball B is approximately averaging over 1 balls What about supp f B v Same thing happens because e i x something f will have Fourier support in B 0 and taking absolute values means we don t notice the e i x something modulation Returning to R P n 1 q p R P n 1 loc q p B R x S n B R 1 on B R supp B R B R 1 0 Last lecture Can choose B R such that B R R n B R 1 0 B R 1 1 Case 1 p q 1 LHS of using H lder is munder I R 1 1 p q I R 1 1 f B R 1 q 1 q 2 n q d d n p q I R 1 1 p q n f B R q d d p q f q B R d 1 q munder 1 Holder I R 1 1 p q n n f q B R d d p q I R 1 1 p q n f q d p q Case 2 p q 1 Use P 1 2 for intuition Imagine a function g which is approximately constant on each R 1 cube Q Think of g as g Q g Q Note Therefore if 2 c R 1 C for all 2 I R 1 P 0 2 Q R 1 for 2 c R 1 I R 1 1 p q p q C p q I R 1 1 p q I R 1 C p q R 1 t 1 g t t 2 2 d t d 2 p q Important locally constant property means we didn t need p q 1 like before Make the intuition rigorous Consider the integral 1 f B R 2 n q d 1 n f B R 2 n d q d 1 n f q B R 2 n d d Same pointwise Holder R n R 1 n 1 n f q d R 1 n f q R 1 1 R p q f q p q