4 Introduction to Fourier Restriction Theorem Hausdorff Young inequality Assuming that 1 p 2 1 p 1 q 1 Then Proof The inequality is true for p 1 q and for p 2 q 2 the inequality is true since we have equality Plancherel For values in between we can interpolate Are there any other p q for which We saw that 1 p 2 was necessary translations modulations Khinchin s inequality Scaling Plug in f x f x which is L normalised f f Then f n f 1 which is L 1 normalised f 1 f 1 So we need for all 0 So we need n n q n p i e 1 p 1 q 1 Classical questions What is C p q the smallest constant such that f q C p q f p Which functions f satisfy f q f p C p q 2014 Fourier restriction asks which p q permit estimates f L q R f L p n R is the restricted frequency set R n Example R B 1 0 n unit ball Basically sitll governed by Hausdorff Young inequality Example R B 1 0 x n 0 measure 0 subset of n R R p q means Always R R 1 true for all R In the second example only this trivial statement is true i e R R p q is false for all other values for p q Let R S n 1 be the unit sphere in n Consider where L q S n 1 uses the usual surface measure d on S n 1 Notation We may call the inverse Fourier transform Let C c n valued 1 2 on B 1 0 with support in B 2 0 May also assume is valued 1 on B c 0 bounded x m x 2 1 m m x behaves like B 1 0 in L p Consider dilates f R x R 1 x e 2 i x v r R 1 Frequency side f R R n B R 1 0 x L 1 norm B R 1 n S n 1 cap of radius R 1 Spacial side f R x B R 0 x in L norm height 1 n f R x p d x R n R n n 1 q R n p n n 1 q n p Consider g R x e i x w r R 1 x 1 R 1 x n 1 R 2 x n Frequency g r c y l i n d e r 1 c y l i n d e r c y l i n d e r 1 R 1 R 1 R 2 1 R n 1 Spatial side g R x c y l i n d e r x L norm g R x p R n 1 2 R n 1 R n 1 n 1 q R n 1 q n 1 n 1 q n 1 p Implies B On Monday we will build examples h such that h sees all of S n 1 R S n 1 R n Consider the statement recall that we called this R S n 1 p q Fix C c n B 1 0 For computing L p norms B c 0 Wave packet function with localised spatial and frequency behaviour Last time f R x e i x v R R 1 x 1 R 1 x n 1 R 2 x n Frequency f R S n 1 f R q d Spatial f R x 1 f R p Note sphere near n looks like 1 1 1 2 2 S n 1 supp f R cap of radius R 1 Naive attempt g R x R n R x Frequency g R S n 1 g R q d 1 Spatial g R x g R p R n R n p Deduce 1 R n p n so trivial g R 1 on S n 1 made g R L q S n 1 easy to compute Could we improve things Could think about R 1 then g R L q S n 1 1 g R p 1 This is more efficient but we can t take a limit So not so useful Build a function H x which satisfies H 1 on S n 1 Let be a maximal collection of R 1 spaced points on S n 1 R n 1 For each let A 1 n n be an affine map which sends Define A H x x H 1 on S n 1 actually on R 2 neighbourhood of S n 1 S n 1 H q d 1 H x x x Frequency x Spatial ess supp H ess supp bush of tubes R n 1 many R R R 2 tubes in R 1 separated directions Compute munder n T x 2 p 2 n T x p 2 munder R n 1 p 2 R n Consider overlap of T on S n 1 R R 2 Average overlap on S n 1 Not too hard to check that the number of active T on S n 1 is n 1 R 2 n 1 Now calculate Two cases either R 2 n dominates or the other term dominates So p 2 n n 1