14 Dual isogenies and the Weil pairing Let K be a perfect field and E K an elliptic curve Proposition 14 1 Assuming that E K be a finite Gal K K stable subgroup Then there exists an elliptic curve E K and a separable isogeny E E defined over K with kernel such that every isogeny E E with factors uniquely via Proof Omitted see Silverman Chapter III Proposition 4 12 Proposition 14 2 Assuming that E E an isogeny of degree n Then there exists a unique isogeny E E such that n Proof Case is separable We have ker n hence ker E n Apply Proposition 14 1 with n Case is inseparable omitted Uniqueness Suppose 1 2 n Then 1 2 0 so deg 1 2 deg 0 Then deg 1 2 0 hence 1 2 Remark i Write E 1 E 2 to mean E 1 and E 2 are isogenous Then is an equivalence relation ii deg n n 2 gives that deg deg and n n iii Note n E n E Hence n E In particular iv If E E E then v If End E then 2 Tr deg 0 So Tr deg Hence Tr Lemma 14 3 Assuming that Hom E E Then Proof i If E E then this follows from Tr Tr Tr ii In general let E E be any isogeny e g Then Hence the result follows Remark In Silverman s book he proves Lemma 14 3 first and uses this to show deg Hom E E is a quadratic form Notation sum Div E E n p P formal sum n P P a d d u s i n g g r o u p l a w Recall E Pic 0 E P P 0 Therefore sum D D for all D Div 0 E We deduce Lemma 14 4 Assuming that D Div E Then D 0 if and only if deg D 0 and sum D 0 E We will now discuss Weil pairing Let E E be an isogeny of degree n with Dual isogeny E E Assume char K n hence separable We define the Weil pairing e E E n Let T E Then n T 0 so there exists f K E such that div f n T n 0 Pick T 0 E K with T 0 T Then T 0 P E P T 0 P E P has sum n T 0 T 0 T 0 So there exists g K E such that div g T 0 Now div f div f n T 0 div g n Therefore f c g n for some c K Rescaling f we can say without loss of generality c 1 i e f g n For S E we get S div g div g so S g g for some K i e g X S g X is independent of choice of X E K Now n g X S n g X n f X S f X 1 since S E Hence n We define e S T g X S g X Proposition 14 5 e is bilinear and non degenerate Proof i Linearity in first argument e S 1 S 2 T g X S 1 S 2 g X S 2 g X S 2 g X e S T e S 2 T ii Linearity in second argument Let T 1 T 2 E div f 1 n T 1 n 0 f g 1 n div f 2 n T 2 n 0 f 2 g 2 n There exists h K E such that div h T 1 T 2 T 1 T 2 0 Then put f f 1 f 2 h n and g g 1 g 2 h Check div f n T 1 T 2 n 0 Yes f f 1 f 2 h n g 1 g 2 h n g n Therefore e S T 1 T 2 g X S g X g 1 X S g 1 X g 2 X S g 2 X h X h X S 1 since S E e S T 1 e S T 2 iii e is non degenerate Fix T E Suppose e S T 1 for all S E Then S g g for all S E Have K E K E is a Galois extension with Galois group E S E acts on K E via S Therefore g h for some h K E So f g n h n So f h n and hence div h T 0 So T 0 We ve shown E Hom E n It is an isomorphism since E E n Remark i If E E are defined over K then e is Galois equivariant i e Gal K K S E T E e S T e S T ii Taking n E E so n gives e n E n E n n 2 n Corollary 14 6 Assuming that E n E K Then n K Proof Let T E n have order n Non degeneracy of e n implies that there exists S E n such that e n S T is a primitive n th root of unity say n Then n e n S T e n S T n for all Gal K K So n K Example There does not exist E with E tors 3 2 Remark In fact e n is alternating i e e n T T 1 for all T E n This implies e n S T e n T S 1