11 Kummer Theory

Let K be a field and char⁡K∤n. Assume μn⊂K.

Lemma 11.1. Assuming that:

  • Δ⊂K∗∕(K∗)n a finite subgroup

  • L=K(Δn)

Then L∕K is Galois and Gal⁡(L∕K)≅⁡Hom⁡(Δ,μn).

Proof. μn⊂K gives L∕K normal, and char⁡K∤n gives that L∕K is separable. So L∕K is Galois.

Define the Kummer pairing

⟨,⟩:Gal⁡(L∕K)×Δ→μn(σ,x)↦σ(xn)xn

Well-defined: Suppose α,β∈L with αn=βn=x. Then (αβ)n=1, so αβ∈μn⊂K. Then σ(αβ)=αβ for all σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K), hence σ(α)α=σ(β)β for all σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K).

Bilinear:

⟨στ,x⟩=σ(τxn)τxnτxnxn=⟨σ,x⟩⟨τ,x⟩⟨σ,xy⟩=σxynxyn=σxnxnσynyn=⟨σ,x⟩⟨σ,y⟩

Non-degenerate: Let σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K). If ⟨σ,x⟩=1 for all x∈Δ, then

σxn=xn∀⁡x∈Δ

adn hence σ fixes L pointwise, i.e. σ=1.

Let x(K∗)n∈Δ. If ⟨σ,x⟩=1 for all σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K), then

σxn=xn∀⁡σ∈Gal⁡(L∕K).

So xn∈K, so x∈(K∗)n, i.e. x(K∗)n∈Δ is the identity element.

We get injective group homomorphisms

  • (i) Gal⁡(L∕K)↪Hom⁡(Δ,μn).
  • (ii) Δ↪Hom⁡(Gal⁡(L∕K),μn).

(i) implies Gal⁡(L∕K) is abelian and of exponent dividing n.

Fact: If G is a finite abelian group of exponent dividing n then Hom⁡(G,μn)≅⁡G (non canonically).

So

|Gal⁡(L∕K)|≤(i)|Δ|≤(ii)|Gal⁡(L∕K)|.

Therefore (i) and (ii) are isomorphisms. □

Example. Gal⁡(ℚ(2,3,5)∕ℚ)≅⁡(ℤ∕2ℤ)3.

Definition (Abelian extension). We say L∕K is abelian if it is Galois, and has abelian Galois group.

Similarly for other group terminology (e.g. we can say that L∕K has exponent dividing n to mean that it is Galois, with Galois group having exponent dividing n).

Theorem 11.2. There is a bijection

{finite subgroupsΔ⊂K∗∕(K∗)n}↔{finite abelian extension L∕Kof exponent dividing n}Δ↦K(Δn)(L∗)n∩K∗(K∗)n←↤L

Proof.

  • (i) Let Δ⊂K∗∕(K∗)n be a finite subgroup. Let L=K(Δn) and Δ′=(L∗)n∩K∗(K∗)n.

    We must show Δ=Δ′.

    Clearly Δ⊂Δ′. So

    L=K(Δn)⊂K(Δ′n)⊂L.

    So K(Δn)=K(Δ′n). So Lemma 11.1 gives |Δ|=|Δ′|.

    Since Δ⊂Δ′, it follows that Δ=Δ′.

  • (ii) Let L∕K be a finite abelian extension of exponent dividing n. Let Δ=(L∗)n∩K∗(K∗)n. Then K(Δn)⊂L and we aim to prove this inclusion is an equality.

    Let G=Gal⁡(L∕K). Thu Kummer pairing gives an injection Δ↪Hom⁡(G,μn).

    Claim: This map is surjective.

    Granted the claim,

    [K(Δn):K]=Lemma 11.1|Δ|=by claim|G|=[L:K]

    Since K(Δn)⊂L it follows that L=K(Δn).

    Proof of claim: Let χ:G→μn be a group homomorphism. Distinct automorphisms are linearly independent. So there exists a∈L such that

    ∑τ∈Gχ(τ)−1τ(a)⏟=y≠0.

    Let σ∈G. Then

    σ(y)=∑τ∈Gχ(τ)−1στ(a)=∑τ∈Gχ(σ−1τ)−1τ(a)=χ(σ)∑τ∈Gχ(τ)−1τ(a)=χ(σ)⋅y(∗)

    Therefore σ(yn)=yn for all σ∈G. Hence yn∈K.

    Let x=yn. Then x∈K∗∩(L∗)n. Then x(K∗)n∈Δ.

    Also, by (∗), χ:σ↦σ(y)y=σxnxn. So the map Δ↪Hom⁡(G,μn) sends x↦χ. This proves the claim. □

Proposition 11.3. Assuming: - K a number field - μn⊂K - S a finite set of promes of K Then there are only finitely many extensions L∕K such that

  • (i) L∕K is a finite abelian extension of exponent dividing n
  • (ii) L∕K is unramified at all 𝔭∉S

Proof. Theorem 11.2 gives L=K(Δn) for some Δ⊂K∗∕(K∗)n a finite subgroup.

Let 𝔭 be a prime of K.

𝔭OL=P1e1⋯Prer

for P1,…,Pr some distinct primes in OL.

If x∈K∗ represents an element of Δ then

nvPi(xn)=vPi(x)=eiv𝔭(x).

If 𝔭∉S then all ei=1, so v𝔭(x)≡0(modn). Therefore Δ⊂K(S,n) where

K(S,n)={x∈K∗∕(K∗)n|v𝔭(x)≡0(modn) ∀⁡𝔭∉S}.

The proof is completed by the next lemma. □

Lemma 11.4. K(S,n) is finite.

Proof. The map

K(S,n)→(ℤ∕nℤ)|S|x↦(v𝔭(x)(modn))𝔭∈S

is a group homomorphism with kernel K(∅,n).

Since |S|<∞, it suffices to prove the lemma with S=∅.

If x∈K∗ represents an element of K(∅,n) then (x)=𝔞n for some fractional ideal 𝔞. There is a short exact sequence

0→OK∗∕(OK∗)n→K(∅,n)→Cl⁡K→0x(K∗)n↦[𝔞]

|Cl⁡K|<∞ and OK∗ being a finitely generated abelian group (Dirichlet’s unit theorem) gives us that K(ϕ,n) is finite. □