%! TEX root = GT.tex % vim: tw=50 % 17/10/2023 09AM \vspace{-1em} To see a typical application of \nameref{halls_thm}, consider $G$ a finite group and $H$ a subgroup of $G$. We have the left cosets $L_1, \ldots, L_k$ say $g_1 H, \ldots, g_k H$ and right cosets $R_1, \ldots, R_k$, say $H g_1', \ldots, H g_k'$, where $k$ is the index of $H$ in $G$. Can we pick the same representatives? In other words, can we pick some $g_1, \ldots, g_k$ such that the left cosets are $g_1 H, \ldots, g_k H$ and the right cosets are $H g_1, \ldots, H g_k$, up to reordering? Equivalently, can we reorder the $R_i$ such that $L_i \cap R_i \neq \emptyset ~\forall i$? In other words, we seek a matching in the bipartite graph with vertex sets $X = \{L_1, \ldots, L_k\}$, $Y = \{R_1, \ldots, R_k\}$, for which $L_i$ is joined to $R_i$ if their intersection is non-empty. By \nameref{halls_thm}, it is enough to show $|\Gamma(A)| \ge |A| ~\forall A \subset X$. In other words, we need $\bigcup_{i \in A} L_i$ meets at least $|A|$ right cosets. But $\bigcup_{i \in A} L_i = |A| |H|$, $\bigcup_{i \in A} L_i$ must meet at least $|A|$ right cosets as each right coset has size $|H|$. \section{Connectivity} How ``connected'' is a connected graph? A path $P$ is connected, $P - x$ is disconnected for some $x \in P$. A cycle $C$ is connected, and also $C - x$ is connected $\forall x \in C$, but $C - x - y$ is disconnected for some $x, y \in C$. If $G$ is a ``cube'', then $G - x - y$ is connected $\forall x, y \in G$, but can be disconnected by removing three vertices. \begin{flashcard}[connectivity-of-a-graph-defn] \begin{definition*}[Connectivity] \glsadjdefn{k_conn}{$k$-connected}{\gls{graph}} \cloze{ For a graph $G$ with $|G| \ge 2$, the \emph{connectivity} of $G$, written $\kappa(G)$, is the least size of a set $S \subset V$ such that $G - S$ is disconnected or a single point. If $\kappa(G) \ge k$, we say $G$ is $k$-connected. Equivalently, $G$ is $k$-connected if and only if $|G| > k$ and for all $S \subset V$ with $|S| < k$, $G - S$ is connected. } \end{definition*} \end{flashcard} \begin{example*} \phantom{} \begin{enumerate}[(1)] \item No tree is $2$-connected. \item $C_n$ is $2$-connected but not $3$-connected. \item The ``cube'' is $3$-connected. \end{enumerate} \end{example*} \begin{warning*} We can have $\kappa(G - x) > \kappa(G)$. For example, consider a cycle joined to a vertex $x$. Then $\kappa(G) = 1$, but $G - x = C_n$, so $\kappa(G - x) = 2$. \end{warning*} \begin{remark*} We must have $\kappa(G) \le \delta(G)$, since for any $x \in G$, removing $\Gamma(x)$ from $G$ disconnects it. \end{remark*} \vspace{-1em} We have that if $G$ is $1$-connected, then there is an $ab$-path in $G$ for all distinct $a, b \in G$. It would be nice if $G$ being $k$-connected implies there exists a family of $k$ independent paths from $a$ to $b$. \begin{flashcard}[independent-paths-defn] \begin{definition*}[independent paths] \cloze{We say that two $ab$-paths $P_1$ and $P_2$ are \emph{independent} if $P_1 \cap P_2 = \{a, b\}$.} \end{definition*} \end{flashcard} \begin{flashcard}[separator-defn] \begin{definition*}[$ab$-separator] \glsnoundefn{separator}{separator}{separators} \cloze{For distinct $a, b \in G$, say $S \subset V \setminus \{a, b\}$ separates $a$ and $b$, or is an $ab$-separator, if $a$ and $b$ are in different components of $G - S$. Equivalently, every $ab$-path meets $S$.} \end{definition*} \end{flashcard} \begin{flashcard}[mengers-thm] \begin{theorem}[Menger's Theorem] \label{mengers_thm} \cloze{ Let $a$ and $b$ be distinct non-adjacent vertices in a graph $G$ such that every $ab$-separator has size at least $k$. Then $G$ contains a family of $k$ independent $ab$-paths. } \end{theorem} \end{flashcard} \begin{remark*} \phantom{} \begin{enumerate}[(1)] \item The converse is trivial. It we have $k$ independent paths from $a$ to $b$, then any separator $S$ must meet each path. \item An equivalent formulation says that the minimum size of an $ab$-separator is the maximum size of an independent family of $ab$-paths. \item We need $a$ and $b$ to be non-adjacent, else there would be no separators! \item We cannot just ``pick a point on each of a maximum-sized independent family of $ab$-path'' to prove this. \item \nameref{mengers_thm} generalises \nameref{halls_thm}. Indeed, given bipartite $G$ on $X$, $Y$, form $G'$ by adding $a, b$ where $\Gamma(a) = X$, $\Gamma(b) = Y$. Then, $G$ has a matching if and only if $G'$ has a family of $|X|$ independent $ab$-paths. So, by \nameref{mengers_thm}, it is enough to show that each $ab$-separator $S$ has size of at least $|X|$. Let $S = A \cup B$ be a separator, with $A \subset X$ and $B \subset Y$. Since $S$ is a separator, we must have $\Gamma_G(X \setminus A) \subset B$. So $|S| = |A| + |B| \ge |A| + \Gamma_G(X \setminus A)| \ge |A| + |X \setminus A| = |X|$. \end{enumerate} \end{remark*}