% vim: tw=50 % 04/03/2022 10AM \subsubsection*{Harmonic Functions} Solutions to the Laplace equation \[ \nabla^2 \psi = 0 \] are called \emph{harmonic functions}. \begin{claim*}[The mean value property] If $\psi$ is harmonic in a region $V$ that includes the ball with boundary \[ S_r : |\bf{x} - \bf{a}| = R \] then \[ \psi(\bf{a}) = \ol{\psi}(R) := \frac{1}{4\pi R^2} \int{S_R} \psi(\bf{x}) \dd S \] i.e. the value in the middle of the sphere is equal to the average over the boundary of the ball. \end{claim*} \begin{proof} In spherical polar coordinates \[ \dd S = r^2 \sin \theta \dd \theta \dd \phi \] \[ \ol{\psi}(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int \dd \phi \int \dd \theta \sin\theta \psi(x, \theta, \phi) \] \begin{align*} \dfrac{\ol{\psi}}{r}(R) &= \frac{1}{4\pi} \int \dd \phi \int \dd \theta \sin \theta \pfrac{\psi}{r} (R, \theta, \phi) \\ &= \frac{1}{4\pi R^2} \int_{S_R} \pfrac{\psi}{r} \dd S \implies \dfrac{\ol{\psi}}{r} (R) = \frac{1}{4\pi R^2} \int_{S_R} \nabla \psi \cdot \bf{\dd S} \\ &= \frac{1}{4 \pi R^2} \int_{\text{Ball}} \nabla^2 \psi \dd V \\ &= 0 \end{align*} by the divergence theorem. But $\ol{\psi}(R) \to \psi(\bf{a})$ as $R \to 0$ hence $\ol{\psi}(R) = \psi{a}$ for all $R$. \end{proof} \begin{claim*} A harmonic function can have neither a maximum nor a minimum in the interior of $V$. The max / min lie on $\partial V$. \end{claim*} \begin{proof} If $\exists$ a local maximum at $\bf{a}$ then $\exists$ $\eps$ such that $\psi(\bf{x}) < \psi(\bf{a})$ for all $|\bf{x} - \bf{a}| < \eps$. But this contradicts that $\ol{\psi}(R) = \psi(\bf{a})$ for $0 < R < \eps$. \end{proof} \begin{note*} Saddle points are allowed. The Hessian is \[ \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^i \partial x^j} \] has eigenvalues $\lambda_i$, but $\nabla^2 \psi = 0 \implies \sum_i \lambda_i = 0$ so $\lambda_i$ must be both positive and negative. (This has a loophole when all $\lambda_i = 0$ which is closed by our previous proof). \end{note*} \subsubsection*{Integral Solutions} We want to solve the Poisson equation \[ \nabla^2 \psi = -\rho(\bf{x}) \] for a fixed $\rho(\bf{x})$. Consider \[ \psi(\bf{x}) = \frac{\lambda}{4 \pi r} \] for $\lambda$ fixed. Previously we showed that this solves $\nabla^2 \psi = 0$, at least if $r \neq 0$. By what happens at $r = 0$? Something must be going on because \begin{align*} \int_V \nabla^2 \psi \dd V &= \int_S \nabla \psi \cdot \bf{\dd S} \\ &= -\lambda \end{align*} We can't have $\nabla^2 \psi = 0$ everywhere! Instead, $\psi = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi r}$ must actually solve the Poisson equation for some source $\rho(\bf{x})$. But we know $\rho(\bf{x}) = 0$ for all $\bf{x} \neq 0$. And we must have \[ \int \rho(\bf{x}) \dd V = \lambda \] The source is the 3D Dirac delta function: \[ \rho(\bf{x}) = \lambda \delta^3(\bf{x}) \] Here $\delta^3(\bf{x})$ is an infinite spike at the origin, such that \[ \int_V f(\bf{x}) \delta^3(\bf{x}) \dd V = f(\bf{x} = 0) \] In particular \[ \int_V \delta^3(\bf{x}) \dd V = 1 \] So, we've learned that $\psi = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi r}$ does \emph{not} solve the Laplace equation, but \[ \nabla^2 \psi = -\lambda \delta^3(\bf{x}) \implies \psi(\bf{x}) = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi r} \] \begin{claim*} $\nabla^2 \psi = -\rho$ has the integral solution \[ \psi(\bf{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{V'} \frac{\rho(\bf{x}')}{|\bf{x} - \bf{x}'|} \dd V' \] ($V'$ should include any region with $\rho(\bf{x}') = 0$) \end{claim*} \begin{proof} Intuition is that you sum over ``$\frac{1}{r}$'' solutions, weighted by $\rho(\bf{x}')$ for each $\bf{x}'$. \[ \nabla^2 \psi(\bf{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{V'} \rho(\bf{x}') \nabla^2 \left( \frac{1}{|\bf{x} - \bf{x}'|} \right) \dd V' \] (here $\nabla$ differentiates $\bf{x}$ and treats $\bf{x}'$ as constant) but \[ \nabla^2 \left( \frac{1}{|\bf{x} - \bf{x}'|} \right) = -4\pi \delta^3(\bf{x} - \bf{x}') \] (this is our previous result that $\nabla^2 \frac{1}{r} = -4\pi \delta^3(\bf{x})$ but with the origin shifted to $\bf{x}'$) \begin{align*} \implies \nabla^2 \psi &= -\int_{V'} \rho(\bf{x}') \delta^3(\bf{x} - \bf{x}') \dd V' \\ &= -\rho(\bf{x}) \end{align*} \end{proof} \myskip This powerful technique is known as the \emph{Green's function} approach.