% vim: tw=50 % 01/03/2022 10AM \newpage \section{Special Relativity} When particles travel very fast, Newtonian mechanics breaks down and is replaced by Einstein's theory of special relativity. The effects of special relativity only become apparent when the speed of the particles approaches the speed of light (in a vacuum) \[ c = 3.00 \times 10^8 \mathsf{ms^{-1}} \] \[ \text{speed of sound in air} \approx 300 \mathsf{ms^{-1}} \] \[ \text{escape velocity} \approx 10^4 \mathsf{ms^{-1}} \] The theory of special relativity rests on 2 postulates: \begin{enumerate}[(1)] \item The principle of relativity - the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames (Galilean principle of relativity). \item The speed of light in vacuous (= in a vacuum) is the same in all inertial frames. \end{enumerate} Postulate 2 is weird - `common sense' says that a car moving at speed $v$ should have its light travelling at speed $c + v$ with respect to the ground. (This is not compatible with Galilean relativity). \myskip Consider 2 inertial frames, $S$ and $S'$, moving relative to each other with $\bf{v} = (v, 0, 0)$. Galilean transformations would relate the coordinates as: \[ x' = x - vt \quad y' = y, \quad z' = z \quad t' = t .\] A ray of light travels in the $x$-direction in frame $S$ with speed $c$ $\implies$ it traces out trajectory $\frac{x}{t} = c$. \[ \text{Galilean transformation} \implies \frac{x'}{t'} = \frac{x - vt}{t} = c - v \] Only way to incorporate postulate 2 (and 1) is to change the definition of time. \subsection{Lorentz Transformations} $S$, $S'$ moving relative speed $v$ in $x$-direction. Ignore $y$ and $z$ for now. Want to know relationship between $x'$, $t'$, $x$ and $t$. The most general form is \[ x' = f(x, t) \qquad t' = g(x, t) \] for some functions $f$ and $g$. \myskip Left alone, a particle should travel in a straight line viewed in $S$ and $S'$. (both inertial frames). So, the map $(x, t) \mapsto (x', t')$ takes straight lines to straight lines (i.e. it is linear, for example $x' = \alpha_1 x + \alpha_2 t$, $t' = \alpha_3 x + \alpha_4 t$; $\alpha_i$ are functions of $v$). $S$, $S'$ move at relative speed $v$. Assume that origins coincide $\implies$ lines $x = vt$ must map to \[ x' = 0 \implies x' = \gamma(x - vt) \tag{8.1} \] for some $\gamma = \gamma(v)$ (it shouldn't depend on 1D direction of $\bf{v}$, i.e. $\gamma(v) = \gamma(-v)$; from rotational invariance). (position of observer sitting origin of $S'$). \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth] {images/c6cbe1669a3d11ec.png} \end{center} But from the perspective of $S'$, $S$ moves with velocity $-v$. \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth] {images/d3b3cd309a3d11ec.png} \end{center} Same argument as (8.1) \[ \implies x = \gamma(x' + vt') \tag{8.2} \] so \[ ct' = \gamma(c - v)t \qquad \text{and} \qquad ct = \gamma(c + v) t' \] so \[ \boxed{\gamma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}} \] - important! \begin{note*} \begin{itemize} \item $v \ll c$: $\gamma \approx 1$ $\implies$ Special Relativity $\to$ Galilean transformations \item $v \to c$: $\gamma \to \infty$ \item $v > c$: $\gamma$ is imaginary - unphysical \end{itemize} \end{note*} \noindent (8.1) reads $\boxed{x' = \gamma(x - vt)}$ while \[ x = \gamma(x' + vt') = \gamma [\gamma(x - vt) + vt'] \] \[ \implies \boxed{t' = \gamma \left( t - \frac{v}{c^2}x \right)} \] (this is the \emph{Lorentz transformations} (= \emph{Lorentz boosts})). They tend to Galilean transformations in $\lim \frac{v}{c} \to 0$. ($t' = t$). Inverting, \[ x = \gamma(x' + vt') \] \[ t = \gamma \left( t' + \frac{v}{c^2}x \right) \] (note same, with $v \mapsto -v$). The directions perpendicular to direction of motion have the trivial transformation law $y' = y$, $z' = z$. \subsubsection*{Checking the Constancy of the Speed of Light} A light ray travelling in the $y$-direction in $S$ has trajectory $x = 0$, $y = ct$. In $S'$, trajectory is \[ x' = -vt' \qquad \text{and} \qquad y' = \frac{ct'}{\gamma} \] and the speed of light is \[ v'^2 = \left( \frac{x'}{t'} \right)^2 = v^2 + \frac{c^2}{\gamma^2} = c^2 \] i.e. the same, so postulate 2 holds. \subsubsection*{Space-time Diagrams} In a fixed inertial frame $S$, draw a direction of space - say $x$ coordinate along horizontal coordinate and $ct$ along vertical coordinate. \begin{center} \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth] {images/101a85ce9a3f11ec.png} \end{center} The union of space and time is called \emph{Minkowski spacetime}. Each point $P$ represents an \emph{event}. We label the coordinates of $P$ as $(ct, x)$ (note backwards convention)!